Services · Process automation
Business process automation that keeps the judgement human.
We automate the repetitive steps in how your business runs, from onboarding and approvals to data entry, documents and handoffs, across the tools you already use, and we design for the exceptions as carefully as the happy path.
Hours returned from repetitive admin, and processes that run the same way whoever is on shift.
Part of Internal tools & dashboards
You’ll recognise this
- The same details are typed into three systems for every new client or job.
- Work stops because an approval is waiting in someone’s inbox.
- You have Zapier automations nobody fully understands, and some have quietly stopped.
- Every new hire learns the process from whoever happens to be free.
What it’s costing you
The expensive part is the part nobody invoices.
Manual processes cost twice: the hours spent typing, chasing and checking, and the mistakes that slip through when people are rushed. Neither appears on a report, which is why they survive for years.
-
Lever 01
Capacity without hiring
Admin steps removed from every client and job, so the same team handles more work.
Moves: Revenue per employee
-
Lever 02
Faster cycle times
Approvals and handoffs that move the same day, so clients wait less and invoices go out sooner.
Moves: Days from request to done
-
Lever 03
Fewer costly errors
Data captured once and checked automatically, so the wrong figure never reaches the client.
Moves: Rework and credits issued
Built for
Who brings us this work.
The people who usually start these engagements, what they are measured on, and the question they arrive with.
-
Founder-led B2B service firms
Founders of B2B service businesses whose sales and delivery have outgrown the founder’s inbox.
Measured on: Pipeline, win rate and revenue per employee
- Leads arrive faster than anyone can answer them, and the best ones go cold over a weekend.
- The CRM is half-filled, so forecasting is a guess and follow-up depends on memory.
- Growth means hiring, because every process still needs a person in the middle of it.
What changes: A pipeline that answers, qualifies and follows up on its own, and a business that can grow without adding headcount at the same rate.
“We are not a tech company. Custom software sounds like a large, risky project.”
Engagements start with a short scoping sprint and a fixed scope for the first build. You see working software early and decide each next step on evidence.
-
Ops, sales & growth leaders
Heads of operations, sales or marketing inside mid-size companies, with a mandate and no spare engineering team.
Measured on: Cost to serve, cycle time and cost per acquisition
- IT has a long queue, and your team’s workflow is not at the top of it.
- You are paying for overlapping SaaS that still does not match how your team works.
- Leadership wants AI in the business, with no clear view of where it is safe and useful.
What changes: The system your team needs, delivered alongside IT rather than queued behind it, with security and ownership handled properly.
“Will it pass our security review, and who supports it afterwards?”
We build in accounts you control, document everything, work to your security requirements and either run it with you or hand it to your team.
Before and after
The same week, run two ways.
Today
- Details retyped into every system
- Approvals waiting in inboxes
- Automations that fail silently
- Process lives in people’s heads
With the system in place
- Data entered once, checked, passed on
- Approvals routed and escalated
- Every run logged, failures flagged
- The process documented and enforced
What we build
Process automation, designed around your work.
Onboarding, approvals, data entry and handoffs automated across your tools, with every exception routed to a person instead of failing silently.
-
Process mapping
The real process written down, step by step, with who does what, which steps can be automated and which need a person.
-
Data entry removed
Information captured once and passed to every system that needs it, checked and formatted on the way.
-
Approval flows
Requests routed to the right approver with the context attached, escalated when they wait too long.
-
Document handling
Contracts, forms and reports generated from templates, filed in the right place and sent for signature.
-
Exception handling
When a step fails or data looks wrong, a person is told with enough context to fix it in minutes.
-
Monitoring
A log of every run and a view of what is stuck, so automation never fails silently.
- Forms & email
- CRM records
- Documents
- Spreadsheets
Automated workflow
Built for one business, owned by it
- Updated systems
- Routed approvals
- Generated documents
- Exception alerts
Working thesis
Automate the exceptions first.
Most automation projects automate the easy path and leave the exceptions to whoever notices. The result is a process that works most of the time and fails invisibly the rest, which is worse than the manual process it replaced.
We map where the process breaks before we automate where it flows. Every automation we build has an owner, a log and a clear path for the cases it can’t handle.
Built in-house
We build this for ourselves first.
Scribbify runs software products of its own. Each one is the same kind of work, tested on our own business before yours.
-
LeadSpidey · AI SDR for inbound leads
Multi-step workflows that branch on what each lead does, reset on reply and stop on bounces, running unattended around the clock.
About LeadSpidey -
Prosvano · LinkedIn automation
Automation with approvals built in: drafts wait for a person, limits are respected and one click pauses everything.
About Prosvano
How it runs
Working software early. Then the next step.
Phases, not promises: every engagement starts with a scoping sprint, and each step is decided on evidence.
-
01
Weeks 1–2
Map the real process
Watch the work, document every step and exception, and pick the process that costs the most to run by hand.
-
02
Weeks 3–6
First process automated
The workflow built with logging and exception paths, run alongside the manual process until it proves itself.
-
03
Ongoing
The next process
Further processes automated on the same foundation, each measured in hours saved and errors avoided.
Works with the tools you keep
- Google Workspace
- Microsoft 365
- Slack
- DocuSign
- Xero
- QuickBooks
- HubSpot
- Zoho
- n8n
- Make
- Zapier
- Any REST API
Build, buy or configure
An honest comparison.
Sometimes software you can buy is the right answer, and we will say so. This is how we weigh it.
| What matters | Off-the-shelf SaaS | Low-code builder | Scribbify build |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fits how your team actually works | Partly: You adapt to its fields | Partly: Until the rules get complex | Yes: Designed around your workflow |
| You own the code and the data | No: Rented | Partly: Locked to the platform | Yes: Yours, documented |
| Joins every tool you already use | Partly: Where integrations exist | Partly: Simple connections | Yes: Any API or export |
| Cost stays flat as you hire | No: Priced per seat | No: Priced per seat | Yes: No per-seat licence |
| AI agents with approvals built in | Partly: Generic assistants | Partly: Add-ons | Yes: Built for your rules |
| Someone accountable for the outcome | No: A support ticket | No: Your own team | Yes: Measured with you |
Questions
Before you write.
Which processes should we automate first?
Do you use Zapier, Make or n8n, or write code?
What happens when an automation fails?
Can you fix automations someone else built?
Where does AI fit in?
Will our team still be in control?
How soon will we see time saved?
Start a project
Talk to us about process automation.
Tell us where the work or the revenue gets stuck. A partner replies within one business day.
More services
Start a project
Start with one workflow.
A few lines are enough. A partner reads every enquiry and replies within one business day.
Tell us where the work gets stuck.
Send a few lines on the workflow, the tools it runs on and what it costs you. We will tell you plainly whether building is worth it.
Or write to us at [email protected]