Scribbify did not begin as a software company. We began by doing client work, and client work kept showing us where ordinary tools stopped fitting the way an agency actually operates.
Rank tracking was one of those gaps. The job looked simple: check where a client’s keywords rank, compare the movement and turn the result into something the client can understand. In practice, the same work returned every week. Someone had to choose the location and language, run the checks, organise the keywords, export the data and prepare the report.
Serpify began as a way to remove a recurring agency ritual, not as an attempt to add another SEO tool to the market.
The problem was not rank data
SEO teams already had access to data. The problem was the work around it. Manual checks were slow and inconsistent. Large platforms often carried more complexity than a focused agency workflow needed. Reporting still required people to move information between tools before a client could use it.
That distinction matters. Buying more features does not automatically remove more work. A useful internal system starts with the repeated decision or handoff that consumes the team.
For us, that meant a focused question: what would rank tracking look like if it were designed around the weekly work of an SEO agency?
The first operating version
We built Serpify around the actions our own workflow required. Users could add domains and keywords, choose the target country and language, run on-demand checks and export the results. The interface was intentionally direct because the goal was not to create another dashboard that needed training. The goal was to get from a client list to useful ranking information with less handling.
What changed after people used it
The public launch on 2 May 2023 was the beginning of the product, not the end of the build. The first paid user arrived on 19 May. That early use changed the roadmap quickly.
Automated daily checks and email reporting shipped on 29 May. Preferred-page tracking, report controls and reporting layout fixes followed. Keyword research, untracked-keyword handling and multiple-email reporting came next. By July, users could add custom branding and SMTP settings, track competitors and use a dark interface.
None of those additions came from a generic feature checklist. They came from the work around the rank check: who needs the report, which page should rank, how an agency presents the output and what needs attention without another manual review.
You can read the dated releases in the Serpify public build log.
The larger lesson for agency software
Serpify taught us that the strongest software opportunities often hide inside boring, repeated work. The task does not need to look innovative. It needs to happen frequently, consume attention and carry enough business value that removing friction changes capacity.
This is also why we do not recommend replacing every subscription. Standard problems are usually served well by standard software. The opportunity appears when a valuable workflow is specific to your operation and your team keeps adapting itself to the tool.
Our guide to custom software versus SaaS explains how to make that decision without turning ownership into an ideology.
From one tool to a way of building
Serpify became the first of six products Scribbify built from operational problems. LeadSpidey handles fast lead response and qualification. TaskSpidey focuses on delivery priorities and status work. ScrapeGoodLeads supports prospect research and outreach preparation. TravelSpidey brings a travel operation into one dashboard. WanderlyGPT reduces the work required to create an itinerary.
The products are different. The starting point is the same: find the work that repeats, identify why existing tools leave a gap, and build around the way the operation actually moves.
If your team has its own version of the Monday rank-reporting ritual, use the agency operations bottleneck map to identify whether it deserves automation, integration or a focused internal tool.
Have a workflow your team should not be doing by hand? Bring the bottleneck to a 30-minute scoping call. You will leave with a clear recommendation, even when the right answer is to keep the software you already have.
Join the discussion.
Add a useful correction, question or operating lesson. Your email address is never published.